The Francis report, mortality rates, the treatment of whistleblowers, relentlessly negative media coverage, and a system crisis over last winter, have combined to create a perfect storm in the NHS. The regulators are under fire, and the reforms have not yet settled in. And in the midst of all this, we suddenly find we were concentrating on the wrong things? In recent years waiting and access times, and healthcare-acquired infection rates, have improved significantly, as indeed has ward cleanliness, mortality and public satisfaction – but overnight the priorities have changed – to compassion and patient experience, clinical safety, care of the frail elderly, and culture
It is pretty clear that openness, listening, safe and compassionate care, and clinical standards are now the order of the day, alongside a pressing need to improve staff morale and engagement. But why has this happened and what needs to change to allow us to make progress?
I believe that solving our emergency care challenge will be the single biggest step we can make to improve in all these areas. By and large, quality and standards are not perceived to be deficient in our elective or highly specialised services. Most safety concerns, and most outcome variability and poor care experiences arise in our hard-pressed acute and ‘front door’ areas. In addition, the relentless pressure, and the sheer difficulty of providing the standard of care our front line staff aspire to deliver under these near-crisis or crisis conditions, is responsible for much of the low morale in the service
Managers put enormous time and effort into trying to address ‘flow’, and worry about both the quality issues and the performance consequences of not achieving the targets. They become demoralised too. Constantly fixing ‘today’ is all-consuming, and it surely detracts from a Board’s ability to innovate by removing any ‘headroom’ that might otherwise be available for fresh thinking about how to sort ‘tomorrow’ and beyond?
My own organisation is highly geared to ‘front door’ activity, and we operate in high demand communities. I no longer believe I can solve these challenges in a sustainable way unless we move, as a system, from an acute model of healthcare to one based on proactively managing the health and well-being of those with long term conditions, including frailty
Most urgently admitted patients have one or more long term conditions, and the proportion is growing. Hospital activity is boosted by a ‘revolving door’ process of frequent readmissions and we know that discharge is delayed, to the detriment of both hospital performance and patient wellbeing, by insufficient capacity in home and community care sectors
The notion of ‘shifting care out of hospitals’ has been received wisdom for years now, yet it hasn’t happened. I have argued before that this is an issue of model of care, not geography
We need to invert the system, so it defaults to home rather than hospital. We need to understand that managing the wellbeing of this growing sector of the population will lead to better health, and lower cost through reduced hospitalisation. To achieve this three things are crucial…
Firstly, we must acknowledge that without significant transformation of the hospital sector the shift will continue to stall. With flat funding, and half of all current monies in the hospital sector, there has to be a transfer of resource if change is to happen. This must mean service rationalisation and, yes, fewer acute hospitals. It is inescapable because we need more capacity outside our hospitals, in both health and social care
Secondly, we need an entirely new leadership approach. Chief Officers like myself are accountable to our own organisational Boards, so we need a means of creating an overarching set of objectives that are equally binding, because only system level collaboration and change will create the necessary transformation. If we do not do this, then narrow organisational interests, and accountabilities, will continue to prevent progress
Thirdly, we need to stop treating every deficit as a performance issue, and understand that driving individual organisations hard using narrow measures will perpetuate the current system, and stifle change
I haven’t met anybody who does not believe we need a ‘chronic disease management model of care’ in the NHS, but we cannot achieve this unless we change the way we operate. If we do not do this, and create a narrative that the public understand and support, then emergency care will remain a struggle, staff will remain demoralised, and patients will continue to be disadvantaged
(This is a precis of a talk I gave to the Australian Disease Management Association annual conference in Sydney in August entitled: ‘Healthcare transformation and chronic disease management; a CEO perspective’)
BernardM
As someone who started work in the NHS in 1968 when they were phasing out matrons and have witnessed and discussed so many changes since. I believe the problem is and always will be decision making. Most dedicated NHS professionals have all the answers to a great and economic service, but they are not engaged effectively in the decision making process.
I believe the NHS should legislate for business architecture through internal design team drawn from all levels. My e-book ‘Business Architecture Made Easy’ attracted an interesting response on Amazon from a NHS employee that is worth reading ( see also http://www.arcibus.com)
Simon
Agree 100% Mark. The $64,000,000 question is “How?” If we have not managed to avoid the mess we are in then we clearly do now have what we need to get out of it. What is missing? Could it be impossible? Could it be too difficult for anyone to do? Or could it be that we have just not learned how to design a future processes/care pathways/collaborative systems of care that do what we need? We are continually burning the toast then scraping it – what we need is a toaster that does not burn toast – and that requires design capability. We need to design such a toaster. Unfortunately neither doctors nor managers are trained in process design. In fact they are not even aware that there is a well understood science of process design. That, IMHO is the gap and until we bridge that we will remain in Burn-and-Scrape Purgatory until we individually and collectively burn out. And that is why I have created on-line training for the basics of process design in healthcare. http://www.saasoft.com/fish/course
Bruce Gray
Mark,
Should we stop talking about the ’emergency care challenge’ as if it is the root cause to be solved? It is a symptom of problems that are spread throughout the health system. I know you understand this as the rest of your post goes on to acknowledge quite rightly that a system view is the way forward. But how to get there…?
Ref. your 2nd and 3rd paragraphs about:
…”openness, listening, safe and compassionate care, and clinical standards are now the order of the day, alongside a pressing need to improve staff morale and engagement”, and;
…”solving our emergency care challenge will be the single biggest step we can make to improve in all these areas”.
What would it mean for us (our Trust and the wider healthcare system) if we looked at this cause and effect the other way round, i.e. improving how we do on openness, listening, safe & compassionate care, staff engagement & morale…will be the single biggest step we can make to solve the emergency care challenge.
The challenge is to learn how to be open, to listen, to be safe and improve our safety, to engage staff so that morale grows, and to do this in tandem with partners throughout the healthcare system.
I read a book review today of ‘Becoming a better boss: Why good management is so difficult (Julian Birkinshaw), and a particular quote caught my eye:
Value is created by employees in their relationship with customers. So management’s job is to serve the employees”.
I was at an interesting talk yesterday about the potential role of coaching in transformational change – the key difference was that this was about systematic and planned coaching that is focused on achieving organisational goals, rather than just personal development-style coaching…something to consider across a health economy perhaps?
Regards, Bruce Gray.
Hugh Rayner
Dear Mark,
You have again made the case very elegantly. Rhetorically, I wonder who would possibly wish to be a CEO of an acute Trust under pressure at the moment? It seems to be a job with little prospect of giving satisfaction from making a difference.
Conversely, taking on the challenge of leading a healthcare system within an appropriate governance structure could be a stimulating job with some prospect of satisfaction.
The best leaders aren’t in it for the money. Professionally rewarding roles are needed to attract and retain them.
Best wishes
Hugh
Mark Patel
As Fred Lee once said, “A culture of continuous improvement prevails when:
Dissatisfaction with ‘as is’
+
Dream of ‘could be’
+
Knowledge of ‘how to’
> Organisational inertia”
From walking around and talking to our staff, everyone is fed up the ‘as is’, and are starting to think about the ‘could be’, so the real question, which Don Berwick eluded to, do we have the knowledge of ‘how to’ and is it in the right place and actively supported?